There is no doubt that, in many countries, significantly more students are now entering university and taking mathematics courses than was the case ten years or so ago. On the other hand, an increasingly smaller percentage of students appears to be opting for studies which require substantial amounts of mathematics. Thus university departments are faced with a double challenge. On the one hand, they have to cope with the influx of students whose preparation, background knowledge and even attitudes are quite different to those of past students. On the other hand, they have to attract students to pursue studies in mathematics, where employment opportunities and well-paying jobs appear not to be as certain as in some other disciplines.
There is no doubt that, in many countries, significantly more students are now entering university and taking mathematics courses than was the case ten years or so ago. On the other hand, an increasingly smaller percentage of students appears to be opting for studies which require substantial amounts of mathematics. Thus university departments are faced with a double challenge. On the one hand, they have to cope with the influx of students whose preparation, background knowledge and even attitudes are quite different to those of past students. On the other hand, they have to attract students to pursue studies in mathematics, where employment opportunities and well-paying jobs appear not to be as certain as in some other disciplines.
There is also often perceived to be a discontinuity between mathematics education in secondary schools and mathematics education in universities. Certainly the levels of ambition and demand placed on students are increased at the tertiary level. There is not the same attention paid to learning theories in the delivery of university mathematics as there is in the teaching of the subject at lower levels. University teaching methods tend to be more conservative. Often university teachers have joint responsibility for research and teaching. This is clearly beneficial but it can cause more emphasis to be placed on mathematical research in places where that is the main criterion for promotion.
Teachers of university mathematics courses, on the whole, have not been trained to, and do not often consider educational, didactic or pedagogical issues beyond the determination of the syllabus; few have been provided with incentives or encouragement to seek out the results of mathematics education. In days gone by responsibility was placed largely on students' shoulders: it was assumed that faculty's responsibilties were primarily to present material clearly, and that good students would pass and poor ones fail. The climate today is that academic staff are considered to have greater overall responsibility for students' learning. The role of instruction (specifically, of lectures) and staff accountability are being reconsidered.
Worldwide, increasing use is also being made of computers and calculators in mathematics instruction. Much mathematical software and many teaching packages are available for a range of curriculum topics. This, of course, raises such issues as what such software and packages offer to the teaching and learning of the subject, and what potential problems for understanding and reasoning they might generate. It would be good to collect examples of the use of information technology and software which enrich students experience of mathematics and result in better understanding and learning.
Many academic mathematicians are aware of changes occurring around them, and of experimentation with different teaching approaches, but they have limited opportunities to embrace change owing to faculty structures and organisation. Further, the relationships between mathematicians in mathematics departments and their colleagues in mathematics education are often strained, with less productive dialogue between them than there might be. The same can be said of relationships between mathematicians and engineers, economists, etc., even though mathematics service teaching to students in other disciplines is an enormous enterprise. These general factors tend to work against, or delay, improvements in the teaching and learning of mathematics, particularly for those students whose main interests are in other disciplines.
As a result of the changing world scene, ICMI feels that there is a need to examine both the current and future states of the teaching and learning of mathematics at university level. The primary aim of this ICMI Study is therefore to pave the way for improvements in the teaching and learning of mathematics at university level for all students.
To achieve this aim it is important for the professionals involved to
back to ICMI
Bulletin No. 43
previous
chapter of this Study
Table
of Contents for this Study
next
chapter of this Study
The following questions are of particular interest for the Study.
For several reasons, in many countries there has been a move to mass education at university level. As a result many mathematics departments are providing courses for a much wider range of ability and needs than was formerly the case. Simultaneously with this increase in student numbers, there has been a change in the kind of student preparation in secondary schools as well as in students interests and motivation. Consequently many students have not met material which was in most secondary school curricula of the 1970s. In addition they may have been taught by an approach which places more emphasis on the intuitive and pragmatic. Some university mathematics departments have been slow in recognising these changes in their student intake. Others have developed new courses to cope for the range of content needs but have made few pedagogical concessions.
There are a number of special groups of students including potential
teachers of school mathematics, scientists, engineers. What should the
interaction between mathematical and professional knowledge be? To what
extent do these groups need specially designed courses?
As far as the changing clientele is concerned, it is not clear that its constitution or its needs have been adequately considered. What are the professional aspirations of our student population? Will they go on to be teachers, to work in industry, to be academics, etc.? How should the curriculum be shaped to meet the needs of these groups?
What changes are, or should be, taking place in the curriculum? Some mathematical subject areas are on the decline while others are in the ascendancy. What is the rationale for the changes? Are some content areas now less important and should other areas take their place?
Mathematics as a rapidly developing research field is continuously undergoing
changes with new fields arising, changes of emphasis, and so on. At present
we notice strong interactions between different branches, an increasing
interest in applications, the development of an experimental approach,
etc. To what extent is and should this evolution be reflected in the teaching
of the subject at undergraduate level?
Two of the central issues here are the role of the student and the attitude
towards the subject. Under what circumstances should the student s role
be to receive information and when should it be to interact with the content
in more dynamic ways (including exchanges with their teachers and with
other students)? Under what circumstances should the subject be presented
as a set of skills (algorithms), as a set of processes or as a combination
of these? The attitude of the teacher will require different reactions
and actions from students.
Some areas of mathematics are met by students before they enter university and the approaches they have met in school may well be quite different from those which are common in universities. Mathematics majors, for example, have to meet a more formal approach to calculus/analysis.What are the best ways to effect this change of approach? But, given the changes in clientele referred to earlier, it is likely that the transition to university teaching poses problems for all students. How can the transition from school to university be best accomplished?
This raises the issue of the philosophical approach to the subject. Many courses appear to concentrate on content knowledge. The emphasis seems to be on learning certain algorithms or theorems and applying them in controlled situations. This hides the creative and problem solving aspects of the subject. Should more emphasis be placed on the way that mathematicians think and create? Should there be more emphasis on students problem solving capabilities as opposed to their learning the results the subject produces? How can the impact of problem-based lectures, the use of computers, project work and so on, be assessed?
One of the issues that requires discussion is the importance placed upon teaching by universities generally. In many universities, promotion is based largely on research output, with teaching having a minor role. In such places, there is little incentive for academics to put more emphasis on their teaching. There are, of course, many academics who put quite a lot of work into their teaching. Should the profession through its national bodies, show that it recognises the importance of teaching at the university level?
Another relevant issue is, where and how do academics learn to teach? Some universities have courses for their staff but these often do not go into any great depth in particular subject areas. Should more formal instruction be given and, if so, by whom and of what type?
Now that there is relatively ready access to computers, graphical calculators and calculators, it is worth examining to what extent we can release our students from some of the drudgery experienced by past generations. How has the new technology changed the content and philosophy of the curriculum? How can mathematics majors benefit from using computer technology? How can majors in other subjects benefit? Should existing programmes be delivered in the same way as in the past or can technology assist in the development of higher order skills or other more important skills?
back to ICMI
Bulletin No. 43
previous
chapter of this Study
Table
of Contents for this Study
next
chapter of this Study
The previously mentioned increasing number of students at the university level has, in many nations, occurred either explicitly or implicitly as the result of government policy. Is there cause for satisfaction with the result of this policy or is there a need to change or modify it in some way?
The mathematical community is convinced of the importance of mathematics
both for its own sake and for the contribution that it ultimately makes
to society. It is not clear that society in general also holds this position.
Perhaps it does not realise what it takes to generate the contribution
mathematics can make. What does the mathematical community need to do to
make society aware of the mathematical requirements of society and how
these can be achieved? What does the mathematical community need to do
to make mathematics more visible in a competitive environment? In what
ways should society provide its citizens with the basic ideas and philosophy
of mathematics and its impact on our lives, both from a philosophical and
practical point of view?
In some countries, university degrees are of a general nature and cover
a range of topics. In other countries, there are more directed programmes
for students to follow. What is more, some of the more applicable areas
of mathematics may be taught outside a mathematics department by engineers,
statisticians, physicists, etc. To what extent should courses be general
and to what extent should they be specific to each user group? To what
extent should courses be taught by mathematicians and to what extent should
they be taught by experts from other appropriate fields?
What then is the role of a department of mathematics at the end of
the twentieth century, given that there is a tendency for nonmathematics
departments to teach their own mathematics? (This is not only for bureaucratic
reasons but also because these departments are often dissatisfied with
the gap between the content and approach they require and the content and
approach of mathematics departments.) Should departments of mathematics
be responsible for all of the students taking mathematics at its university
or should it concentrate on its traditional clientele, the mathematics
majors? Will departments which do not teach a range of students remain
viable in an environment where a balanced budget, rather than education,
is the main concern of administrators? What cooperation can there be with
other disciplines for whom mathematics is a service course? In some cases
there is an overlap in the material being taught in courses by a mathematics
department and a service department. Are there good reasons for continuing
this practice?
Clearly no university department can teach all branches of mathematics. Are there fundamental branches of the subject which should be in all programmes? How should the balance be struck between suitable major components?
How strongly are incoming students influenced by career prospects in mathematics? How should this affect the courses offered and the advice given to prospective students?
back to ICMI
Bulletin No. 43
previous
chapter of this Study
Table
of Contents for this Study
next
chapter of this Study
Given the style of the conference, we anticipate a variety of types of contributions that will be presented in plenary sessions, working groups, panels and short presentations. Presentations may include position papers, discussion papers, surveys of relevant areas, reports of projects, or research papers of an educational nature.
We invite you to make a submission for consideration by the International Programme Committee no later than 1 May 1998. Submissions should be up to three pages in length and may be emailed, faxed or sent as hard copy. They should be related to the problems and issues identified in this document but need not be limited to these alone. You might also draw to the attention of the Committee, the names of other people whom you feel ought to be invited, stating the type of the contribution they might make. We would appreciate knowing the nature and results of related studies in this area.
Participation in the conference is by invitation only. Invitations to those whose submissions have been accepted will be made in July 1998. At the same time invitees will be asked to produce a longer version of their submission for publication in the pre-conference proceedings. The Study organisers are seeking funds to provide partial support to enable participants from non-affluent countries to attend the conference but it is unlikely that full support will be available for any one individual.
All contributions and suggestions concerning the content of the study and the conference programme should be sent to
The second part of the Study is a publication which will appear in the ICMI Study Series. This publication will be based both on the contributions requested above and the outcomes of the conference working group and panel deliberations. The exact format of the publication has not yet been decided but it is expected to be an edited, coherent book which it is hoped will be a standard reference in this field for some time.
The planned timetable for the Study is as follows:
back to ICMI
Bulletin No. 43
previous
chapter of this Study
Table
of Contents for this Study
next
chapter of this Study